The enigmatic Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, has remained a figure of mystery in the lore of crypto since his emergence over 15 years ago. After vanishing from the public eye for over a decade, recent events have reignited curiosity and speculation as to who this man/woman/alien is; specifically, the @satoshi X account coming back to life after five years of silence, sparking a flurry of discussions and debates.
The disappearance of Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto’s disappearance from public view dates back to around 2010, following the release of the Bitcoin whitepaper in 2008. This withdrawal from the spotlight only fueled more questions and speculation about Nakamoto’s true identity. For years, the crypto community eagerly awaited any sign or communication from the elusive creator. Throughout this time, the Bitcoin creator’s wallet has remained untouched, holding 1.1 million BTC.
The Resurfacing of the x account
Out of nowhere, the Satoshi Nakamoto X account, which had remained dormant since 2018, suddenly became active once again on October 2nd. This return to the platform was marked by a cryptic tweet that hinted at exploring aspects of Bitcoin not explicitly detailed in the original Bitcoin whitepaper. The tweet has since gained widespread attention from crypto users and news media outlets alike, receiving over 6.3 million views within the past few days.
However, before we all get excited about the second coming of Satoshi, the authenticity of this reactivated account has been met with high skepticism. As we know from the plethora of bot accounts and scam artists plaguing the X platform, users can obtain a verified badge through a paid subscription, so the blue tick attached to the account is redundant, in this instance.
Furthermore, many commenters have expressed doubts about the authenticity of the account given that the real Satoshi Nakamoto was known for prioritizing anonymity and security. It’s hard to imagine Satoshi entering his VISA debit card details into X, and there is surely a named record of whoever did indeed pay for it.
If Not Satoshi, who?
Over the years, numerous individuals have claimed to be Nakamoto, with Australian computer scientist Craig Wright being one of the most prominent among them. Wright’s claims have been met with challenges and legal battles, and the first @satoshi tweet was hit with the infamous “Community Notes” stick very hard, with Wright prominently mentioned within. It reads:
“This isn’t the real Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of Bitcoin. It’s an account related to Craig Wright, who claims to be Satoshi with no material proof. The account below is rumored to be the real Satoshi, 1 of only 2 accounts posting about BTC in 2009 w/Hal Finney. https://twitter.com/fafcffacfff”
One day later, the @satoshi account tweeted again, and was promptly Community Noted once more. This time, it appears the issue has been settled:
“This account is controlled by fraudulent Satoshi Craig Wright as confirmed by his financier Calvin Ayre and Christen Ager Hanssen, the former CEO of nChain. The “year of the dragon” is a reference to BSV. Do not trust this account:
https://x.com/calvinayre/status/1709097950033400214
https://x.com/agerhanssen/status/1708911279044170050”
Final Thoughts
The bear market hits us all in different ways. Some leave Web3 altogether, some dig in deep and double down on their convictions, some learn skills and start building, and some opt to cosplay as Satoshi Nakamoto and post mystical riddles. Each to their own!
Regardless of who is behind the resurgence of this account, it’s important to echo the sentiment found within the comments of the accounts posts: Don’t click any links that come from this account. Scammers are becoming increasingly sophisticated, using social engineering tactics that appear more convincing over time.
The best way to protect your wallet is to exercise extreme skepticism when dealing with accounts and messages from individuals you do not personally know. As always, stay safe!
Opinions expressed here are opinions of the Author. Influencive does not endorse or review brands mentioned; does not and cannot investigate relationships with brands, products, and people mentioned and is up to the Author to disclose. Accounts and articles may be professional fee-based.