The problems just keep stacking up for Gary Gensler, head of the SEC, who is now facing a legal challenge from two prominent members of the NFT community. On July 29, law professor Brian Frye and songwriter Jonathan Mann filed a pivotal lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
The lawsuit seeks judicial clarity on whether NFTs fall under the SEC’s regulatory purview. This legal action is the latest example of the escalating conflict between the emerging web3 market and traditional regulatory frameworks, particularly as SEC Chair Gary Gensler has become a contentious figure in the crypto space due to his hardline approach.
A Demand For Clarity
Frye, an authority on NFT and securities law, and Mann, famed for his “Song a Day” project, contend that the SEC’s current approach endangers the creative freedom and financial stability of artists using NFTs. They are calling for clear guidelines on whether artists must register their NFTs with the SEC before public sale and whether they need to disclose risks related to their digital art.
Today, @songadaymann and I sued the @SECGov in Louisiana federal court, asking for a declaration that the SEC can’t regulate the sale of NFT art. I’ve argued that the SEC is abusing its authority for years & now I’m testing my theory. Here’s the complaint. https://t.co/AD8xYpV0kC
— Brian L. Frye (@brianlfrye) July 29, 2024
To illustrate their concerns, the plaintiffs’ legal team has drawn a comparison to Taylor Swift’s concert tickets. They argue that, much like NFTs, these tickets are resold on secondary markets and promoted by the artist. They assert that it would be excessive for the SEC to classify Swift’s tickets or other collectibles as securities, suggesting such a classification would represent an overreach of the SEC’s authority.
Historic SEC vs NFT cases
The SEC’s involvement in the NFT sector has been ongoing. Last year, the SEC targeted Impact Theory, a media and entertainment company, accusing it of promoting its “Founders Key” NFTs as investment opportunities. The SEC deemed these NFTs as investment contracts subject to securities regulations. Impact Theory settled by agreeing to penalties and the destruction of its NFTs.
Subsequently, the SEC acted against Stoner Cats 2 LLC, claiming that it had conducted an unregistered NFT offering that raised $8 million. This case also ended in a settlement, leaving unresolved questions about the broader applicability of securities laws to NFTs.
Much more recently, sports gambling company DraftKings recently decided to shut down its NFT business “effective immediately” following class action lawsuits alleging its NFTs were unregistered securities. The decision to close its Reignmakers and NFT Marketplace came amid legal scrutiny.
Final Thoughts
The outcome of Frye and Mann’s lawsuit could truly reshape how NFTs are regulated in the United States. If the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it could lead to clearer guidelines that make it easier for people to engage with digital assets, potentially sparking new innovations and growth in the NFT market. This would be a win for those eager to explore and contribute to this evolving space without the constant worry of navigating murky regulations
On the flip side, if the court sides with the SEC, we might see stricter rules that could put a damper on creativity and make it harder for new projects to get off the ground. It raises an intriguing question about how similar cases in the traditional market—like those aforementioned Taylor Swift tickets being resold—might also be affected.
Ultimately, this lawsuit isn’t just about NFTs; it’s about finding a balance between regulation and innovation. As we watch these developments unfold, we’re witnessing a pivotal moment that could define the future of digital art and technology.
This is a Contributor Post. Opinions expressed here are opinions of the Contributor. Influencive does not endorse or review brands mentioned; does not and cannot investigate relationships with brands, products, and people mentioned and is up to the Contributor to disclose. Contributors, amongst other accounts and articles may be professional fee-based.